Dan Price: Fundi Vs. Liberal

Thursday, March 23, 2006

Read this(Steve sent this to me). What do you think? Do you basically agree with what he says? Does some of it make you angry? What's your reaction?

Brett said...: I agree with everything after a first brief reading. Perhaps I would find points of contention if I looked a little more critically, but overall it was well written and good points.

as Mark Driscoll often says, "I don't know why they're called fundamentalists; they're no fun at all"
:p; 5:39 PM
Dan Price said...: "why does the author say the two terms aren't much but insults anymore, and then proceed to work the rest of his post into the limitations of those two generally insulting stereotypes?

I was thinking the same thing when I read the article. I agree with most of his points.

As far as Foundationalist determination of truth etc... How do we view truth in the Bible considering what it says about itself, that is it God breathed? Basically it's his words? Can we still apply deconstructionist thought to a supernatural book?

This has been on my mind a lot lately.; 9:46 AM
Anonymous said...: Interesting blog to post Dan. I tried to comment before, but it wouldn't let me. I pretty much agree with him, though I do think it is odd that he would say the terms are meaningless and then describe them anyway. And I don't think I have ever met anyone who would fall into that kind of liberal category.

You're questions about the Bible are really good. I would love to talk to you about that stuff. Don't really have answers, especially to type out here, but it would be a fun conversation. Sometime.; 12:52 PM

Dan Price